Stella-Jones Inc. (OTCPK:STLJF) Q2 2023 Earnings Conference Call August 1, 2023 10:00 AM ET
Company Participants
Eric Vachon – President and Chief Executive Officer
Silvana Travaglini – Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Conference Call Participants
James McGarragle – RBC Capital Markets
Benoit Poirier – Desjardins Securities
Michael Tupholme – TD Securities
Roman Pshenychnyi – National Bank Financial
Operator
Good morning, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Stella-Jones Second Quarter 2023 Earnings Call. At this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. Following the presentation, we will hold question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] I would like to remind everyone that this conference call is being recorded on Wednesday, August 9, 2023.
Please note that comments made on today’s call may contain forward-looking information, and this information, by its nature, is subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from the views expressed today. For further information on these risks and uncertainties, please consult the company’s relevant filings on SEDAR. These documents are also available in the Investor Relations section of Stella-Jones website at www.stella-jones.com. We have also prepared a corresponding presentation, which we encourage you to follow along during this call.
I’ll now pass the call over to Eric Vachon, President and Chief Executive Officer of Stella-Jones. Eric?
Eric Vachon
Thank you, Shirley. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. With me on today’s call is Silvana Travaglini, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Stella-Jones. Earlier this morning, we issued a press release reporting our results for the second quarter of 2023. Along with our MD&A, it can be found in the Investor Relations section of our website at www.stella-jones.com, as well as on SEDAR. As a reminder, all figures expressed on today’s call are in Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated.
I’m pleased with our financial and operating results in the second quarter, which reflected the upward momentum brought on by the rising demand of our infrastructure-related products. It provides a good start to our 2023 to 2025 outlook, which was updated at our inaugural Investor Day in May. We delivered strong second quarter results, fueled by ongoing organic growth, all while setting the stage for the accelerating demand across North America, particularly for utility poles. We did this not only through continuous investments in our network, but also by pursuing acquisitions that support our growth and help us ensure we deliver predictable consistency and quality in serving our customers.
The company has recently made notable additions to its network. In the quarter, we acquired the Southern Yellow Pine pole peeling and drying assets of Balfour Pole Company for a consideration of $15 million. Located in Georgia, Balfour’s operations are situated in an area where we have established — an established presence and this acquisition will help drive costs and operational efficiencies for our utility pole business.
In July, we acquired the Wood utility pole manufacturing business of Baldwin Pole & Piling for $48 million. Baldwin is a storied business with a record of producing quality SYP pole products for its local utility customers. Its Alabama and Mississippi facilities expand our capacity to supply growing demand, while optimizing the overall efficiency of our network, which now counts 45 treating facilities in North America.
I would like to welcome the 80 new employees from Balfour and Baldwin, who joined the Stella-Jones team in the last few weeks. Accretive acquisitions such as Balfour, Baldwin and industries completed earlier this year remain a key area of growth potential for our business as we continue to seek opportunities that complement our network. We are also pleased to highlight the commissioning of our pole peeling facility in Durant, Mississippi, which opened on June 1 and is now fully operational. You can see the significant footprint of the facility on the current slide of the accompanying presentation.
As we scale up to better cater to expected demand acceleration this facility strategically located in the Southeastern United States will help maximize our treating capacity in this area. In the second-half of the year, a second pole peeling facility in the Southeast region will be commissioned, and we will begin work on the planned capacity expansion to increase our Douglas for network all in line with our growth CapEx plan.
Through a combination of strategic capital investments, acquisitions and ongoing organic growth, we have built a strong infrastructure product business. Our customers recognize the quality of our work, ability to adjust to their needs and the strong distribution capabilities we offer. We work in collaboration with our customers to best understand their requirements and over time, we have expanded and innovated our product offerings accordingly. As our customers’ needs evolve, they seek strategic partners that can support their projects and assure product readiness when and where they need it, which we proudly deliver.
Now let’s turn to the business dynamics of each of our key product categories. Our utility pole product category continued its course of strong performance. Market demand remained robust. All while sales volumes were lower in the quarter, we continue to project and work to service the accelerated demand growth for utilities. As we turn our focus to customers’ long-term projects and to agreements structured to support growth, we are adapting to best meet the rising demand into the future.
With our expansive network, vast resources and enhancing production capacity, we have the mechanisms in place to support the expected volume growth ahead of us. Railway Tie sales were also up in the second quarter, benefiting from continued price increases passed on to customers. Inventory constraint shifted our focus to fulfilling long-term commitments, and we are pleased to see a continued trend of dry tie inventory growing stronger month-over-month. We are confident that the current level of untreated tie will allow us to not only continue to honor our long-term commitments, but also service the strong non-class 1 market demand in the upcoming quarters.
Lastly, for residential lumber, we saw healthy demand in Q2, which reflected our ability to supply product consistently to big box retailers and maintain a loyal customer base. Halfway through 2023, our residential lumber product category is performing in alignment with our guidance for annual results.
With that, I will now turn it over to Silvana to provide a more detailed overview of our second quarter financial results. Silvana?
Silvana Travaglini
Thank you, Eric, and good morning, everyone. As Eric stated in his remarks, we’ve had a great start to 2023 with continued strong financial results in the second quarter.
Sales in Q2 increased to $972 million up from $907 million last year. The increase was driven by a 10% organic sales growth of our infrastructure-related businesses, largely explained by pricing gains for utility poles, railway ties and industrial products. This increase was mitigated in part by lower residential lumber sales and lower volumes for utility poles and railway ties.
Sales in the quarter also benefited from the contribution of the pole treating assets acquired from Texas Electric Cooperative in November last year and the positive effect of currency conversion. Utility pole sales increased to $388 million in the second quarter, compared to $360 million for the same period last year largely explained by the organic sales growth of 13% and the contribution of the TEC acquisition.
The organic growth was driven by higher pricing as sales volumes were down quarter-over-quarter due to the impact of extreme weather events on our California customers’ maintenance activity as well as delayed timing of shipments. We expect that the further volumes in Q2 to contribute to more sales in the second-half of the year.
Sales of railway ties rose to $238 million, compared to $250 million last year. Organically, sales were up $13 million or 6%, all attributable and favorable pricing. While Class 1 volumes were up this quarter, overall volumes were down as we did not have enough treated inventory to service the strong non-Class 1 demand, and this then from the limited fiber supply in 2022.
Residential lumber sales of $271 million decreased by $15 million, compared to the same period last year. Q2 sales were impacted by the lower market price of lumber and the resulting decrease in sales price versus the second quarter of 2022. A large part of this decrease was, however, mitigated by the solid sales volume in the quarter. So far this year, sales are in line with our expectations.
Moving now to profitability. Our EBITDA increased to $175 million in the second quarter, up 14%, compared to $154 million in the second quarter of 2022. Outpacing a 7% sales growth. This increase was attributable to the expanded margins of our infrastructure-related product categories, largely on account of price increases realized for utility pole. Led by the strong utility pole sales growth and resulting improvement in product mix, our EBITDA margin increased to 18% from 17% in Q2 last year.
Following a strong start across our product categories, we now expect the EBITDA margin for 2023 to exceed our 16% objective. Net income in the second quarter was $100 million, up 6%, compared to last year, while earnings per share also benefited from the company’s ongoing share repurchase program and was up 14% versus the same period in 2022 to $1.72 per share.
During the quarter, we used the cash generated from operations of $127 million to invest in our network and expand our utility pole production capacity which included the acquisition of Balfour’s pole peeling and drying assets. Also continued to return capital to shareholders in line with our commitments. So far this year, the company has returned $87 million to its shareholders through dividends of $27 million and share repurchases of $60 million. Since the beginning of the current buyback program in late 2022, we have repurchased 1.5 million shares for $80 million.
During the quarter, we continued to build the utility poles inventories to support the strong demand, but it was more than offset by the seasonal decrease in residential lumber inventory. As for the untreated railway tie inventory, it was largely replenished by the end of the first quarter. As we head into the second-half of 2023, we have a healthy inventory position that will allow us to service our customers and meet their evolving needs for our products.
At quarter end, we had $292 million available under our credit facilities and maintained a solid financial position with a net debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 2.6 times. Through our consistent cash flow generation and available credit facilities, we can maintain our assets, meet working capital requirements and finance of business plans.
Yesterday, our Board of Directors announced a dividend of $0.23 per common share payable on September 25, 2023, to shareholders of record at the close of business on September 5. In conclusion, our robust financial performance allows us to stay on course to achieve our growth plans, all while returning value to our shareholders.
With that, I will now turn it back to Eric for his closing remarks.
Eric Vachon
Thank you, Silvana. As we look to the second-half of 2023, we believe we are well positioned for future success to capitalize on additional opportunities. The three acquisitions we concluded to date in 2023 have allowed us to secure fiber supply ahead of expected demand and continued to enhance production and operational efficiency. These acquisitions not only help us remain in line with our goals to augment capacity to keep pace with the demand growth for our utility pole product category, but they also enable us to leverage existing assets within our network.
During our Investor Day, we noted several growth catalysts that will allow us to achieve our financial targets and create long-term shareholder value. For utility poles, ongoing maintenance, broadband expansion and new power generation sources continue to be significant growth catalysts. On the railway tie side, increased volumes, favorable pricing dynamics and product innovations are key growth drivers.
Finally, product expansion, sourcing and procurement as well as favorable macro trends will help drive the residential lumber product category going forward. We are off to a great start and look forward to the second-half of the year. As we set ourselves up nicely to execute on our audited three year growth plan. Through this revised guidance, we endeavor to increase sales to over $3.6 billion by 2025, maintain EBITDA margins of 16% and returned more than $500 million to shareholders, while maintaining a leverage ratio of between 2 times and 2.5 times.
In closing, our established record of success to date can be attributed to our team of outstanding employees across North America. Our customers can rely on us for quality products, certainty of supply and timely service, and that is because of our employees who possess the agility, resourcefulness and dedication to deliver the very best every day.
Thank you for your time today, and I will now open up the lines for questions.
Question-and-Answer Session
Operator
Thank you, Eric. The line is now open for questions. [Operator Instructions] Our first question is from James McGarragle, RBC Capital Markets.
James McGarragle
Hey, Eric. Hey, Silvana. Congrats on a great quarter and thanks for taking my question.
Eric Vachon
Thank you, James. Good morning.
James McGarragle
Yes, so my question is on the U.S. infrastructure bill. I know copper last week and some of the U.S. steel producers during earnings, they’ve made some commentary that they’re starting to see the funds being planned, and they’re expecting some of that money to be spent kind of early 2024. And I know your guidance is it doesn’t include any of that U.S. infrastructure spend, because it’s kind of hard to quantify and to be certain on the timing. But it seems like a lot has changed since your Investor Day. So can you talk to any of the conversations you’re having with regards to U.S. infrastructure spending and any additional color that you guys can give us that’s happened since the Investor Day would be appreciated.
Eric Vachon
Yes, certainly. Thank you, James. Well, the fund allocation is certainly getting organized. It’s very early for us to be able to even speak to it presently. I do think we’ll eventually — we will benefit from the allocation of those funds. But right now, nothing significant on the horizon as far as I can tell. Although dynamics in infrastructure remains strong, and our customers are very active in planning projects. And obviously, all of this is sort of intertwined. But I can’t say I have a very important update on that front.
James McGarragle
And then going back to the infrastructure spending, I think a lot of focus has been what’s going to happen on the utility pole side, but there’s a lot of money being allocated for rail infrastructure as well. And I know a lot of your company’s investments have been on the pole side, but what’s your capacity if a lot of that infrastructure spending were to flow through on the rail side to, kind of, step up tie production given some of the constraints that you are highlighting?
Eric Vachon
That’s a great question. The key in answering this question, it starts with the inventories. And obviously, having dry inventory enabled us to have more throughput at our facilities. So that then explain we are in a healthy inventory situation overall. We now need the proportion of that inventory to increase in — inventory to drive increase over time, and I think we’ll be there in the next few months. So that positions us very well for any upcoming demand. I’m not concerned about the capacity aspect of things. It’s really having access to the resource, the fiber and having the proper dry inventory to be able to respond promptly to the inquiries. And I think we’ve done a lot of work in the last eight months in the Railway Tie division to prepare for good demand in 2024, and our conversation today leads to think that it will be a good year next year, and we’re well positioned for that.
James McGarragle
And then my last question here before I turn it over. I know there’s been some headwinds in your negotiations with the rails to pass on some of those — some of that recent raw material costs on the railway tie side. How those conversations have been evolving? I know your peer was in a similar boat. I think they actually said that they would exit the industry if they don’t — weren’t able to pass those price increases on them. I’m not sure how serious they were about that, but that was something I think that they said on the call. So have you noticed any change in the dynamic with your negotiations with the rails, and over kind of what period of time do you think you’ll be able to pass on some of those raw material price increases on the tie side to kind of work on the margins on that side of the business.
Eric Vachon
Well, with — so as you know, 60% of more or less, or 70% actually, the business is related to Class 1s, we have long-term contracts. And we work within the mechanisms of the contracts we have for price increases. We’ve been adding pricing, we’re increasing pricing quarter-over-quarter now for several quarters, more than [Indiscernible] in the years with almost say like at least eight quarters worth of increases. So we keep pushing forward. We — as a company, we stand our ground. Obviously, we are in business to generate margin and have returns on our working capital investments and we keep pushing for pricing. But actually, in all product categories, that’s what we’re in business for. But we’re moving ahead and then pushing forward on that front.
James McGarragle
Thank you very much and congrats again.
Eric Vachon
Thanks.
Operator
Thank you. Our following question is from Benoit Poirier, Desjardins Securities. Please go ahead.
Eric Vachon
Benoit?
Benoit Poirier
Yes, yes, can you…
Eric Vachon
I can’t hear you well, Benoit.
Benoit Poirier
Okay, can you now? Is it better? Can you hear me?
Eric Vachon
Yes.
Benoit Poirier
Yes, sorry. Okay. Congrats, Eric and Silvana up for the strong start of the year. First question, when we look at the Utility Pole, you achieved 13% organic growth and you point out the delayed timing of shipments and the deferred maintenance of utilities in California, but do you still feel comfortable with the 20% target for the year.
Eric Vachon
Yes, we do.
Benoit Poirier
Okay, okay. And one of your Pole infrastructure peers in the industry came out and spoke about near-term softness in the telco market as you are seeing CapEx spending more aligned to historical trends. Is it more specific to other type of pole or do you still feel maybe some different picture by some telco guys.
Eric Vachon
So not really seeing that. Actually the same pole because they usually share the network. It’s the same type of pole that utilities would be using. We have telcos in the mix of our customers. We haven’t necessarily heard much on that front. Actually, I heard a few telcos come to us and talk about potential broadband projects in the future actually. It’s a bit of the opposite of what you’re stating, but we haven’t seen any softness, Benoit. And honestly, if there were a bit of softness in the mix of all the demand we have on the utility side, I don’t think we’d be even talking about it today.
Benoit Poirier
Okay. With respect to the Canadian wildfires, could you maybe provide some color about how it impacts your operation in the quarters and any changes in the procurement or inventory management and do you see an opportunity to for — to sell the fire-retardant mesh product in Canada following the worst wildfires in the country that we’ve seen.
Eric Vachon
It’s a good question. So I guess, there are two parts to your question. The first one is we’ve been fortunate the areas in which the fires or the area that the fires have impacted did not touch our key procurement areas. So can’t say that for utility poles were impacted and our suppliers for residential lumber either, they seem to be moving along and be able to supply us the required products. As far as the fire retardant — or they are somewhat more fire retardant product. But I would expect to see some interest from Canadian utilities over time because you’re right, it does raise some concerns. Now also bear in mind that areas where the fires impacted are in the wilderness and there’s not always road and utility poles in those areas, but it does bring back to mind or to the thought process about the importance to have a very strong and resilient network.
Benoit Poirier
Okay. And with respect to the EBITDA margin, obviously, strong start, 18% in Q1, higher than expected. And Silvana, you mentioned that you feel comfortable to achieve over 16% for the year. So I was wondering if you could provide some granularity about what could be achieved beyond 16% and whether you could achieve the 17%, 18% level as part of your strategic plan? Or it’s just a one-year strong performance?
Silvana Travaglini
So we’re definitely confident like we said that this year will be above 16% given the strong start and really came from all three product categories. Obviously, utility pole being the most notable one, but good contribution above what we expected from both the railway ties and residential lumber. That being said, beyond this year, the objective is to maintain the 16%, difficult for us at this point in time to project anything beyond that, comfortable that we’ll be able to maintain and we’ll produce that 16% in the next two years of our guidance, but I would not venture out to say at this point to go beyond that for 2024 and 2025.
Benoit Poirier
Okay, thank you very much and congrats.
Eric Vachon
Thanks, Benoit.
Operator
Thank you. Our following question is from Michael Tupholme, TD Securities. Please go ahead.
Michael Tupholme
Good morning.
Eric Vachon
Good morning, Mike.
Michael Tupholme
On the Utility Poles side, can you provide a little bit more detail on the delayed timing of shipments and the deferral of maintenance by utilities in California just to help us understand what sort of an impact that had on that utility poles category, organic growth in the quarter? Just to sort of frame how impactful this was.
Eric Vachon
Well, the — first off, let’s start with our California customers. There were a series of heavy rainfalls in the California region, which led a significant flooding and then landslides and mudslide, we all saw that on the news. So that has sort of pushed out in time the maintenance — the utilities in California have been focusing on restoring some powers and taking care of the infrastructure, but the upgrade in the — that were planned this year has sort of been pushed out to, I guess, late to the second-half and into next year at this point. So that is that dynamic.
With regards to delay of shipments, it’s just the question — the timing of when the customer wants to take the orders. So we have the orders, we have a healthy order book. It’s a question of when the customer is actually going to want to take those orders. The good news there is that our procurement and production functions have been performing extremely well and holding to plan and being able to support the demand. So I guess it led to a small build of inventory at the end of the quarter, but it’s all going to sort of flush itself out I guess in the next two quarters.
Michael Tupholme
Okay. I guess a different way to try to ask the question, if possible, is just you did 13% organic growth in utility poles in the quarter, had you not had those issues you just spoke about and had things shipped as planned, can you tell us what organic growth would have looked like?
Eric Vachon
I think it would have been closer to the 20% we’ve been guiding Mike.
Michael Tupholme
Okay. And as you overcome these issues, is this a situation where you recover those volumes plus do what you would have otherwise done in the second-half? Or does some of this stuff just kind of get shifted to the right.
Eric Vachon
I think it’s a combination. Some of it will get shifted to right and some of them might be a pickup. We’re expecting a good quarter in Q3 as upside, as I mentioned, we have some inventory to ship, all we need is the green light and some railcars or trucks to move them. But then some of them will shift it right, like, for example, the California maintenance. I don’t think those utilities will catch up the H1 volume that they fell short of. I mean, we don’t manage quarter-to-quarter, right? It’s a continuum of our customers having projects that’s moving along, and we’re supporting them. And we feel pretty good about what’s coming ahead of us for future quarters.
Michael Tupholme
That’s helpful. Thank you. As far as the two acquisitions you announced, can you talk about how much annual revenue capacity those two acquisitions will provide you with? And what — as we think about that, I mean, what does that theoretically mean organic growth could be with the benefit of that additional capacity? Because I think that was one of the constraints just looking a little further, but in 2025, one of the constraints to delivering higher revenue growth had been comment on sort of capacity. So this, in part, addresses that issue not necessarily in 2025, but just trying to get a sense for how much this adds.
Eric Vachon
Right. So the Balfour, Baldwin acquisition are different in a sense that Balfour is a pole peeling and drying facility. So they’re actually providing the fiber for our network. So they don’t have a treatment capacity. So it’s more for securing fiber, increasing actually the security of fiber for us and also efficiencies within our network. So that will show up more at the margin level, if you want. The Baldwin acquisition is, I guess, truly a wood treating facility that has peeling, drying and treating capacity ahead of customer list if you want. So we didn’t disclose the sales, but if you look at our history, our sales price usually lined up more or less about one-time sales.
So I think you can use that as a guidance. The Baldwin acquisition does have some upside potential on volume. So I think it is a very key acquisition for us because it comes with the customer list, a book of business. It was very accretive but we think we’d be able to move more volume in the next 12 months through that facility, helping us service better our customers and potentially new customers.
Michael Tupholme
Okay, that’s helpful. Thank you. And then on the margins, so suggesting that this year you could do better than the 16% you previously guided to for EBITDA margins. Is this simply a function of the strong margins through the first-half and the second-half, you’re still thinking about it the same way you previously were? Or could some of the outperformance in the margin that you saw in the first-half, are you expecting that to continue on in the second-half relative to prior expectations?
Eric Vachon
Right. So for the starting point, I guess I’ll go back to Silvana’s comment earlier. So we saw very good margin performance in all three product categories in the first-half of the year, better than I guess, our initial guidance, if you want. I think this will flow through in better part for the year. Obviously, our utility pole product category is leading the group there with healthy pricing and obviously, good performance on the margin. Now let’s also keep in mind a few things. One is our second quarter is usually our highest EBITDA margin quarter because all three product categories are in peak season. So could it sort of tail down or slow down a bit in the next quarters?
Yes. But I think right now, with the performance we’ve seen in the first six months of the year, it’s quite clear that we’ll be exceeding that 16%. The guidance we provided was to maintain 16% in each of the three years of our guidance. And I think I’m very pleased with the performance so far. I think it’s clear to us now that we’ll be achieving this and maintaining it or at least this now for the year, which is great. And once we reset again next year, we’ll obviously shoot to start off and maintain the 16%. And if our team can bring us more, I’ll be happy to celebrate that with the team.
Michael Tupholme
All right, thank you. I will get back in the queue.
Eric Vachon
Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. Our following question is from Roman Pshenychnyi, National Bank Financial. Please go ahead.
Roman Pshenychnyi
Good morning, Eric. Good morning Silvana and congratulations on the quarter.
Eric Vachon
Thank you, Roman. Good morning.
Roman Pshenychnyi
Good morning. I know you touched a bit on the railway ties earlier. But I was wondering if you could comment a little bit more on the level of volumes you’d expect to see over the next year or so. I know over the last number of years, the overall volumes in North America have come down from the $20-plus million mark. And I just want to get a sense of how you see that developing over the next couple of years. Thank you.
Eric Vachon
Well, thanks for the question. I guess I always refer to the industry itself. The railway tie association data shows that the last 25-years, the average volume sold by the industry is around 19 million times. In the last couple of years, we’ve been slightly under that average. However, I do believe that we’ll be working towards that average, let’s say, as early as next year, if not slightly higher than that.
And obviously, being one of the leading suppliers in North America, we would benefit from that increase, in particular, related to our long-term contracts with Class 1 customers. That being said, we’re also seeing healthy demand in the non-Class 1 or the commercial market. And again, as we build our dry inventory, we’ll be addressing more of that market in the coming quarters so that maybe the back half or the end of this year, but certainly into next year when I express future quarters. I’m not limiting it to 2023.
Roman Pshenychnyi
Thank you so much. That’s very helpful. And I just had a second question around the three-year guidance for the next couple of years. And I was wondering whether that guidance already imputes acquisitions explicitly or if it’s purely organic?
Eric Vachon
It was purely organic. So acquisitions were not included in that guidance nor was the effect of infrastructure programs by governments in Canada or the U.S. simply because it’s always hard to predict the timing of acquisition and predict the allocation of funds from government. So all of that is not within our guidance.
Roman Pshenychnyi
Perfect, thank you so much and congratulations again.
Eric Vachon
Thank you. It’s my pleasure.
Operator
Thank you. Our following question is from Benoit Poirier, Desjardins Securities. Please go ahead.
Benoit Poirier
Yes. So just to come back on the Railway Ties, you were able to achieve 6% organic growth in Q2. Just wondering whether is it sustainable going through the second-half? And maybe if you could provide the split between pricing and volume, that would be great.
Eric Vachon
That’s good — actually a good question, Benoit. Our customers have a maintenance program, and it’s not necessarily spread out evenly throughout the year. So if I take a look at the first six months of the year, the increase we’ve been seeing is driven by pricing and offset by some lower volume as we did not have enough dry inventory to sell into the commercial market. Going forward, as I look into the back half of the year, I do — my understanding is that some Class 1 will be slowing down their maintenance programs that — they’ve done the maintenance work they wanted for the summer.
So I do see some maybe a bit more of volume adjustment downwards from — for a couple of Class 1, which would probably bring us back to our low-single-digits, right? So obviously, under the six, and hard to pinpoint that number right now, but definitely call it the low single digit.
Benoit Poirier
That’s great. And when you look at your comments made on non-Class 1 railroad that you’ll be able to better serve those clients toward the back half of the year of 2024. Is it fair to expect the margin profile to go upward for railway ties as you’re able to increase your mix towards those non-class customers.
Eric Vachon
Yes, it should definitely. Obviously, the spot market is what we called quota pricing we’re obviously competing other, I guess, other suppliers, but typically, it’s easier to state our cost profile and requeue, I guess, our cost because there’s no contracts as we’re bidding, we’re actually meeting for what we think we should be getting for the time. So that is definitely a better margin business for now.
Benoit Poirier
Okay. And for Residential Lumber you mentioned still healthy demand at the beatbox store. Recently, we saw an increase in lumber prices. But would it be fair to think that it could be a tailwind going forward that this was not taken into account in your outlook?
Eric Vachon
If price increases with demand, we would maintain, yes, eventually, it would be a tailwind. Internally, we tracked the two by six and it did increase at, let’s say, the end of June early July and sort of tempered off and actually dropped so slightly at the back half of July. But to answer your question, yes, if prices would increase because of pressures of wildfires and dynamics of the like, yes, we would probably see a bit of a tailwind on our sales price.
Benoit Poirier
Okay. And last one for me, just for the Penta phase out deadline in October 2023 in Canada. Any update on the DCOI approval by the government and…
Eric Vachon
We’re not the applicants for the label of DCOI rather supplier is. So we’re not privileged to all the conversations. So there’s no firm time lines that have been communicated. I do believe that the federal agency is working diligently and reviewing the file. And from our side, we have adjusted and are ready to go going forward after October 4 ready to supply our customers with alternate preservatives and alternate solutions as best we can until the government agencies approve DCOI.
Benoit Poirier
Thank you very much. Okay.
Eric Vachon
Thank you, Benoit.
Operator
Thank you. Our following question is from Michael Tupholme, TD Securities. Please go ahead.
Michael Tupholme
Thanks. So just on the pricing front, this has been a key driver to the sales growth you’ve seen for some time now in both poles and ties. Can you talk about the extent to which you’re still seeing new pricing increases put through at present or is all of the benefit you’re getting now reflective of past pricing increases and an easier year-over-year comp?
Eric Vachon
I would say we’re pretty much there, Mike. For utility pole, I would expect, as we look at our pricing here standing in midyear, I don’t think we’d see much more price increases for the balance of the year. Obviously, as we hit next year contract renewals, we’ll be adjusting again, but I don’t believe we’ll see much pricing impact additional to what we’ve seen so far. And on railway ties, it might inch up here their percentage points, but the railway — untreated tie costs have more or less stabilized in the market. So I think we’re pretty much caught up there.
Michael Tupholme
Okay. And so when, when should we see you actually lapping the easier comps such that the pricing tailwind won’t be showing up as a benefit, assuming no further increases of any material degree from here.
Eric Vachon
For railway side, it will be next year, probably Q2 next year be lapping it would be comparable if the dynamics stays the same. For utility poles, the second-half of next year. But yes, I would say that the second-half of next year, but I would expect a small inflationary costs creeping into labor costs and overheads and so on, those are part of the renegotiations we have on an annual basis with our customers when we adjust, so it might keep increasing that as not to the rate of 20% that we’ve seen last year. And this year, obviously, there were different dynamics, but I could see small adjustments going into the future. But I guess, if you want to look at the good point where we would lap, I would say, H2 next year.
Michael Tupholme
Okay, okay. And then maybe just a follow-up to Benoit’s question about railway ties outlook in the second-half. So you said with the possibility of some certain Class 1s pulling back on maintenance a little bit, they’ve completed their maintenance, we could see organic growth drop down a little bit from where it’s been the last couple of quarters. I guess I’m just trying to understand how the possibility of a step-up in non-Class 1 volumes. Does that not act as somewhat of an offset? Or is it just not material enough in the context of whatever kind of a pullback in the Class 1 volumes you see?
Eric Vachon
So there could be a bit of an offset impact. There’s a few things, I guess, and I hope Benoit is still listening because one thing we don’t know is some Class 1s, although they say oh my maintenance is done, for example, at the end of September, it’s not clear. They’re going to buy some, call it, pre-buy, but buy some inventory in October, November to distribute in the network to start maintenance in Q1. So right now, we have no clear signs of that. So either we go down that route to service those customers or we will start servicing the non-Class 1 market, but it would not be enough in Q4 to offset that volume. But it would be like the positive momentum like we’ll have dry inventory, you’ll sell in Q4, it will go into Q1, Q2 of next year, and it will build momentum to — I guess, to catch up some volume downturns we had in the last year.
Michael Tupholme
Okay. So still, when you put that all together, you’re still thinking in the second-half of this year, we could see a little bit of a moderation in organic growth versus that kind of mid-single digits we’ve been seeing.
Eric Vachon
Yes. Yes, exactly.
Michael Tupholme
Okay, that’s great. Thank you.
Eric Vachon
Thank you.
Operator
We have no further questions in the queue. Thank you.
Eric Vachon
Thank you, Shirley, and thank you, everyone, for joining us today. We look forward to speaking with you again at our third quarter update in November.
Operator
Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today’s call. Thank you for your participation, and you may now disconnect your lines.
Read the full article here