(This article was co-produced with Hoya Capital Real Estate)
Introduction
There is a growing assortment of ETFs covering the Small-Cap segment of both the US, International for both the Developed and/or Emerging Markets, or ones that cover the whole range. Besides the usual Growth versus Value sub-parts, I have reviewed others recently for which I provide links at the end of this article. Here I compare a popular Value ETF against one with an Earnings focus, those being:
- iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (NYSEARCA:IJS)
- WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Fund (NYSEARCA:EES)
Historical returns for Small-Cap stocks
While it has not been the case for most of the past decade thanks to technology stocks, longer history shows that smaller is better.
Small-Cap Value has the best CAGR, and despite having the second highest StdDev, SCV stocks still have the best Sharpe and Sortino ratios.
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF review
Seeking Alpha describes this ETF as:
The iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF managed by BlackRock Fund Advisors. The investment seeks to track the investment results of the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, composed of small-capitalization U.S. equities that exhibit value characteristics. IJS started in 2000.
Source: seekingalpha.com IJS
IJS has $6.6b in AUM and has a TTM Yield of 1.52%. Fees are 18bps.
Index review
S&P describes the index as:
We measure value stocks using three factors: the ratios of book value, earnings, and sales to price. S&P Style Indices divide the complete market capitalization of each parent index into growth and value indices. Constituents are drawn from the S&P SmallCap 600®.
Source: spglobal.com index
They also provided some basic data around the index.
An important note about S&P Value/Growth indices is that can hold the same stocks at weights determined by company-level value/growth factors. They provide this chart to show that spectrum.
This results in 188 stocks being in both the S&P 600 Value and Growth indices.
IJS holdings review
I will start with the portfolio characteristics that iShares provides.
Next, I looked at the sector, which will be compared to EES later.
Of the top four sectors, Morningstar classifies all but Industrials as Cyclical; hopefully the FOMC won’t push the US into a recession then.
Top holdings
Ignoring the top holdings, cash, the next 20 stocks account for 14% of the portfolio of just under 500 stocks. The bottom half of the portfolio comes in at 19%, about average from what I have seen for that part of an ETF’s allocation. Unlike some Large-Cap ETFs, this ETF is not dependent on one sector or a few positions to drive its results.
IJS distribution review
Eliminate the outliers, and IJS has shown very little improvement in what they send investors. iShares shows even the extra-large payouts came from income, not any capital gains or ROC, the latter being extremely rare for an ETF. Most likely source were companies paying year-end extra dividends. Due to a missing payout, the payout grade is low at a “D+”.
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Fund review
Seeking Alpha describes this ETF as:
The investment seeks to track the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Index. Under normal circumstances, at least 95% of the fund’s total assets (exclusive of collateral held from securities lending) will be invested in component securities of the index and investments that have economic characteristics that are substantially identical to the economic characteristics of such component securities. The index is a fundamentally weighted index that is comprised of earnings-generating companies within the small-capitalization segment of the U.S. stock market. EES started in 2007.
Source: seekingalpha.com EES
EES is much smaller than IJS at $553m in AUM. The Forward Yield is 1.09% and the fees are 38bps, giving the IJS ETF a 20bps cost edge.
Index review
WisdomTree describes their index as:
The WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Index is a fundamentally weighted index that measures the performance of earnings-generating companies within the small-capitalization segment of the U.S. Stock Market. The index is comprised of the companies in the bottom 25% of the market capitalization of the WisdomTree U.S. Total Market Index after the 500 largest companies have been removed. Companies must be incorporated and listed in the U.S. and have generated positive cumulative earnings over their most recent four fiscal quarters prior to the index measurement date. The index is earnings-weighted in December to reflect the proportionate share of the aggregate earnings each component company has generated. Companies with greater earnings generally have larger weights in the index.
Source: wisdomtree.com/investments/index
EES holdings review
The sector allocation shows EES more concentrated in its largest sector allocations, most of which also top IJS’s allocations, just at higher levels.’
Top holdings
Despite holdings 400 more positions, the Top 20 allocation is only slight less than IJS’s: 13%. Here, the bottom half allocation is 20%, again close to what IJS has. While about 70% of the allocation is in four sectors, only two stocks have a 1+% weight.
EES distribution review
Like IJS, EES shows little payout growth. Also, like IJS, they skipped a payment, which hurts the grade received by Seeking Alpha; here being a “D+”.
Comparing ETFs
Using Fidelity plus some Seeking Alpha, we see they favor EES over IJS: Green cells are the preferred value.
It is very unusual for the same ETF in a comparison to appear better in both value and growth data points. As for Value/Growth stock allocations, Vanguard provides the following.
The big allocation difference is in the percent listed as Growth stocks, with EES having twice the weight as IJS, but all that comes from the Blend allocation.
The ETFs have the following overlap and sector differences.
EES holders also own 70% of the stocks held by IJS. IJS’s biggest allocation difference over EES is in Real Este stocks; EES’s is in Financials.
Since some investors measure every other ETF against the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY), I included it here.
As other have commented, time does matter. So, while SPY is best since 2007, the post-COVID year shows a different result.
Both time periods show IJS and EES close, with their correlation factor being 98%. It seems to come down to which manager an investor prefers and their future opinion on Real Estate and Financial stocks, the big sector differences each ETF currently exposes investors too.
Portfolio strategy
One important question to ask after deciding a Small-Cap allocation is desired is Value, as reviewed here, or Growth stocks. For that, I added the iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (IJT).
Data shows that investors have done better owning IJT compared to either of these Value-oriented ETFs. That isn’t to say there is not a Value ETF that still might be better, as the actively managed AVUV ETF has shown.
When looking at the return and risk data, it show a toss-up between these two Value-focused ETFs. Seeking Alpha’s rating system shows better choices too.
Related links
Here are links to my other recent articles covering Small-Cap funds.
For those wanting international exposure, read AVDV Vs. SCZ: The New ETF Has Proven Its Worth So Far.
Read the full article here