{"id":87645,"date":"2023-11-22T17:21:00","date_gmt":"2023-11-22T22:21:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ifintechworld.com\/markets\/crypto\/social-media-speculates-if-f2pool-is-censoring-transactions-founder-responds\/"},"modified":"2023-11-22T17:21:03","modified_gmt":"2023-11-22T22:21:03","slug":"social-media-speculates-if-f2pool-is-censoring-transactions-founder-responds","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ifintechworld.com\/?p=87645","title":{"rendered":"Social Media Speculates if F2Pool is Censoring Transactions, Founder Responds"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

0x10BC, a Bitcoin development blogger, has unveiled data potentially suggesting that F2Pool has censored a number of recent transactions.<\/p>\n

What 0x10BC\u2019s data says<\/h2>\n

<\/span>
0x10BC, who runs a mining pool observation project with the aim of detecting potential unrecognized potential Bitcoin transactions, \u201cdetected six missing transactions spending from OFAC-sanctioned addresses.\u201d<\/p>\n

The United States Treasury\u2019s Office of Foreign Assets Control, or OFAC for short, enforces and administers international economic sanctions.<\/p>\n

Four of these transactions belonged to F2Pool. Currently, F2Pool is the third largest Bitcoin mining pool, with over 13% of all mined blocks \u00a0existing within the pool.<\/p>\n

\u201cThese four missing sanctioned transactions lead to the conclusion that F2Pool is currently filtering transactions,\u201d the blogger wrote.<\/p>\n

However, based on his current data, 0x10Bc is unable to tell \u201cif F2Pool is filtering this single address or all OFAC-sanctioned addresses.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cThis raises the question of why F2Pool, a pool with origins in Asia, is the first pool to filter transactions based on US OFAC sanctions,\u201d 0x10BC wrote.<\/p>\n

Wang and social media respond<\/h2>\n

<\/span>
OX10BC\u2019s revelatory blog post drew a wave of response on social media, including a response by F2Pool founder Chun Wang.<\/p>\n

\u201cA censorship-resistant system must be designed to resist censorship at the protocol level, rather than relying on each participant to act conscientiously and refrain from censorship,\u201d Wang wrote in a post on X<\/a>. \u201cThe Internet and TCP\/IP have failed this. Bitcoin should learn from the failure.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cThankfully we have you, demonstrating how easily censored Bitcoin is,\u201d one user replied. \u201cThank you for your public service.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cThanks but no, I\u2019d like to keep my small blocks,\u201d another user commented.<\/p>\n

Shortly after the backlash, Wang posted a follow-up message to X.<\/p>\n

\u201cWill disable the tx filtering patch for now, until the community reaches a more comprehensive consensus on this topic,\u201d Chun continued in a separate X post.<\/p>\n

Emerging regulatory discussions<\/h2>\n

<\/span>
News of the potential censorship of OFAC-censored addresses comes as a wave of regulatory developments sweeps the U.S., including news of Binance founder, Changpeng Zhao, stepping down from his role as CEO and pleading guilty to a number of violations.<\/p>\n

Zhao, who is expected to be sentenced on February 23rd, 2024, will have to pay nearly $1 billion to OFAC and $3.4 billion to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) in penalties and forfeitures.<\/p>\n

\u201cBinance\u2019s settlement is the largest in OFAC history, and Binance could face exposure up to billions of dollars in further penalties if it materially breaches its compliance commitments as described under the agreement,\u201d the U.S. treasury said in a statement.<\/p>\n

Beyond his posts on X, Wang has yet to address the speculation further.<\/p>\n

\n
\n

\n
\n Enter your email for our Free Daily Newsletter <\/em>\n <\/p>\n

A quick 3min read about today’s crypto news!<\/p>\n

<\/span>\n<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n